The Great Super Fund Cop Out

The Great Super Fund Cop Out

Throughout our working lives, we are told that we need to ‘trust’ the super fund system. Designed to provide Australians with wealth in their retirement phase, I have serious concerns about who the Superannuation system is actually designed to serve.

The latest reports out of the $2.8 trillion Australian superannuation sector are that the fees are continuing to increase. Over the past year, super fees have increased by 10%, which equates to a whopping $32 million as an additional expense.

The average superannuation fund member is now paying 1.23% of their account balance in fees, jumping from 1.17% at the end of 2017.

Australians are being hoodwinked out of billions of dollars every year in high fees, poor investments, low returns and expensive insurance but yet this system remains ‘compulsory’.

I have always equated superannuation with a way for the government to garnish one-tenth of your wages to government coffers while also removing your right to determine how you spend your hard-earned income.

So what options do you have?

Well, the first option is to abolish the compulsory component of superannuation. Believe it or not but idea has been thrown around government quite often, with Tony Abbott calling our current superannuation system “intergenerational theft”. Imagine the economic growth Australia would see with a $2.8 trillion dollar injected back into people's pockets.

This would not only help carve away the countries deficit but also breathe some new life into the superannuation system which has become bloated, distorted and a detriment to Australians who are forced to participate.

The second option is Self Managed Superannuation Funds, with continuous increases of superannuation fees, family trusts have been steadily growing in popularity. Self Managed Super Funds (SMSF) are not only for the wealthy anymore, but they are also for the financially savvy.

With investment lending at an all-time low and superannuation fees climbing skyward, it only makes sense that investors would look to free up SMSF monies as a means to secure more investment properties.

Related Posts

How Roger Galway Turned the ATO into His Side Hustle

How Roger Galway Turned the ATO into His Side Hustle

When most people think about building wealth, they picture grinding through long hours, promotions, and maybe a few smart stock picks. Roger Galway had a different idea. Two decades ago, he realised the nine-to-five grind wasn’t going to cut it. So he started buying property. Now, he owns nine of them across...

No Storm Surge Here: Brisbane’s Budget Holds Steady for Investors

No Storm Surge Here: Brisbane’s Budget Holds Steady for Investors

In the wake of ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred, which brought Brisbane its wettest day in 50 years with over 420mm of rain in some suburbs and winds reaching up to 60 km/h, the city faced significant recovery challenges. Despite the extensive damage, including power outages affecting over 56,000 homes and businesses,...

Stamp Duty Doesn’t Have to Hurt — Here’s Where It Doesn’t

Stamp Duty Doesn’t Have to Hurt — Here’s Where It Doesn’t

Stamp duty isn’t the most exciting part of buying property, but it can seriously shape what you can afford and how quickly you can grow your portfolio. A national report by SQM Research for the Real Estate Institute of Australia (Stamp Duty: The Relationship to Australian Housing Affordability and Supply, October...

Become a Member Today!

Our mission is to help the average Australian learn the property market dynamics and discover the amazing opportunities that exist in real estate.